Trask (1997): "The most plausible analysis, however, is probably that of Gómez and Sainz (1995:240), who see the underlying verb as '*eradun',..."

 Jarraituz kin atzoko aipua ti Trask (1997), irakurtzen dugu hau:

The eastern varieties show forms like derauka - drauka - daroka (rarely doro - doo) 'he/she has it to him/her'. Such forms are well attested in L and LN, and they are attested in G until the early eighteentg century, and in the HN in the sixteenth century, suggesting that they are the more conservative forms. (...) The most plausible analysis, however, is probably that of Gómez and Sainz (1995:240), who see the underlying verb as *eradun, an otherwise unattested causative of *edun. [Trask, 1997:233]

non Trask-ek hobesten du interpretazioá ti Gómez eta Sainz (1995), nok ikusten duté hor "*eradun" aditza. Aurreko sarrera askotan argi gelditu denez, erabat ados gaude kin "*eradun" interpretazio hori. [>>>]