Zéri deitzen zaio "scrambling"? "The process where a speaker uses a non canonical over canonical word order has been termed as scrambling." (Mishra et al.)
Aipatzen genuen atzo artikulu bat ganik Ramesh K. Mishra, Aparna Pandey eta Narayanan Srinivasan (2010), zein dén titulatzen "Revisiting the scrambling complexity hypothesis in sentence processing: a self-paced reading study on anomaly detection and scrambling in Hindi" (2010), zeinen tituluan bertan agertzen dén kontzeptuá on scrambling. Argitu daigun zéri deitzen zaión scrambling, irákurriz artikuluaren lehen paragrafoa:
Introduction
Natural languages exhibit different types of linearization in word orders. Transformational generative approaches to syntax assumes that sentences in all languages have a base form, that is a canonical word order like Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) for Hindi, and the other word orders are derived from this base structure involving movement and transformation (Chomsky, 1981; Kayne, 1994). A canonical word order has been defined as the most statistically frequent as well as contextually neutral word order (Comrie, 1981). They could be Subject-Verb-Object (SVO) as in English or SOV as in Hindi and Japanese. The process where a speaker uses a non canonical over canonical word order has been termed as scrambling. [Mishra et al., 2010:709-710]
Beraz,
The process where a speaker uses a non canonical over canonical word order has been termed as scrambling. [Mishra et al., 2010:710]Euskaran adibidez, SOV balitz oinarrizko hitz-ordena hori, alegia kanokikoa, estatistikoki maizkoena eta neutroena, orduan beste edozein hitz-ordena (nola adibidez SVO) izanen litzaké derivatua bidéz mugimendu sintaktikoak, hau dá bidéz scrambling (ikus #3146 eta #3147). Jarraitukó. [3150]

1 Comments:
Zen izango interesgarri ikertzea nola zun hitz egingo euskaldun peto-peto batek, demagun XX. mende hasieran. Pertsona honek zuen izan behar alfabetatu gabe, ez zuena ikasi dotrina euskaraz, ta zeinek ez zuen euskaldun kontzientziarik, baizik eta zuen erabiltzen euskara soilik ki komunikatu. Kasu honetan, ¿zuen erabiliko SOV orden kanonikoa ala agian, zuen erabiliko beste orden ez kanoniko bat? Eta hala balitz, ze kontestutan?
Dena dela, galbiltza berandu. Ikerketa hau egin ahal zen, demagun, orain dela ehun urte, berrehun urte. Hala ere, euskaldun hauek ezagutu dituen jendea agian oraindik dago bizirik eta ahal dute erantzun, partzialki, ki galdera oso garrantzitsu hau.
Migeltxo
Argitaratu iruzkina
<< Home