Ruszkowski (2015): "... structures with a shorter element going first are easier to pronounce and can be remembered easier, as felt by the Polish language users."

M. Ruszkowski-k (2015) amaitzen dú bere laburpena on "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law" (2015, ikus azken egunotako sarrerak: 2454, 2455 eta 2456), saiatuz emáten arrazoiren bat zeinekin azáldu Behaghel-en joera, eta horrela, ematen dizkigu bere ustezko honako arrazoi hauek, jarráiki hizkuntz erabiltzaileek:

The effect of Behaghel's law on linear arrangements of constituents is in all likelihood a result of euphonic reasons - structures with a shorter element going first are easier to pronounce and can be remembered easier, as felt by the Polish language users. [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

Hortaz, polonieraren erabiltzaileek, aparte aipátu ze sekuentzia horiek (with a shorter element going first) izanen liraké easier to pronounce, lotzen duté hitz-ordena hori kin memoria-klase bat noiz konsideratzen duten ze horrelako sekuentziak can be remembered easier. Dudagabe izan ahal dirá kontu interesgarriak ki aztértu. [2457] [>>>]

Ruszkowski (2015): "All the sixteen pairs of combinations show the prevailing word order: a shorter noun - a longer noun."

Duela hiru egun Bittor Hidalgo-k mahaigainera ekartzen zigún Behaghel-en legea/joera:

It [Behaghel-en legea] says that an order of constituents in fixed phrases containing equal elements is subject to a certain regularity, the shorter constituent precedes the longer one in general (their length is determined by the number of syllables). [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

zeintaz mintzatu ginén herenegun eta atzo jarráiki artikulu bat ganik M. Ruszkowski, eta zeinen laburpenean autoreak jarraitzen duén esanez:

Calculations were made based on the material excerpted from the National Corpus of Polish. All the sixteen pairs of combinations show the prevailing word order: a shorter noun - a longer noun.  [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

Hortaz, bilatu dirá gure intereseko sekuentziak an National Corpus of Polish datu-basea, non aurkitu dirén 16 konbinazio zein dúten betetzen Behaghel-en eskakizuna. Ez dirudite asko, baina hala ere, denek ere, %100ek betetzen du Behaghel-en legea. Gainera, kontuan hartuz adibidez atzoko adibide erakusgarria...

[treść i forma ('form and content')] ... zeintan polonieraz ematen dén "treść" monosilabikoa lehenago zein "forma" bisilabikoa, bitárten inglesez ematen dén alderantziz, justuki járriz "form" monosilabikoa lehenago zein "content" bisilabikoa,...

bádirudi ze Behaghel-en joera hori ez dela soilik intuizio bat, baizik ze sostenga liteké enpirikoki. [2456] [>>>]

Polonieraz "treść i forma" (1 eta 2 silaba) versus inglesez "form and content" (alderantziz, non 1 eta 2 silaba)

Atzokoan aipatzen genuén artikulu bat ganik M. Ruszkowski, non autoreak zehazten zuén Behaghel-en legea gain ordena an sekuentziak on osagai sintaktikoki-berdinak (printzipioz referitzen da ki sekuentzia jada  finkatuak an hizkuntza, zein egonen dirén normalki lotuak bidéz "eta", "edo" edo juxtaposizioa), zeinen arabera osagai horiek orokorrean kokatuko zirén an ordena gorakorra respektu euren tamaina silabikoa. Honela zioén Ruszkowski-k an laburpena on bere artikulua titúlatzen "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", zeinen hasiera aipatzen genuén atzo:

In 1909, in reliance of linguistic material coming from a few dozens of world's languages, Otto Behaghel formulated a law which he called the law of increasing terms. It says that an order of constituents in fixed phrases containing equal elements is subject to a certain regularity, the shorter constituent precedes the longer one in general (their length is determined by the number of syllables). [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

Ruszkowski-k jarraitzen dú bere artikuluko laburpen hori emánez zenbait adibide non erakusten den zértaz ari zen Behaghel. Hortxe doaz:

Quantitative verification of the law involves comparison of the frequency ratio between equal variant structures in which the two constituents of a different length (measured in syllables) are inverted, e.g. ból i cierpienie ('pain and suffering') - cierpienie i ból, lad i porzadek ('law and order') - porzadek i lad, sacrum i profanum ('the sacred and the profane') - profanum i sacrum, treść i forma ('form and content')-forma i treść. [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

Bereziki interesgarria iruditzen zaigú azken adibide hori:

treść i forma ('form and content')

zeintan polonieraz ematen dén "treść" monosilabikoa lehenago zein "forma" bisilabikoa, bitárten inglesez ematen dén alderantziz, justuki járriz "form" monosilabikoa lehenago zein "content" bisilabikoa, non:

Iruditzen zaigú oso adibide erakusgarria. [2455] [>>>]

Greenberg-en printzipio semantikoa (1978) versus Behaghel-en printzipio digestiboa (1909): printzipio semantikoa gailentzen da

Zioen atzo Bittor Hidalgo-k, nori eskertu nahi diogún bere komentario ondo interesgarria:

Bada beste 'joera/lege' garrantzitsu bat nahiko unibertsala dirudikeena, nahiz hizkuntza indo-europarrentzakoa aipatua izan: «osagai handiagoen jarraitze legea»-edo («Das Gesetz der wachsenden Glieder») izenez ezagutzen dena, 'law of increasing members’ ingelesez, eta Behaghelek lehenengoz 1909an postulatua (‘Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern’: Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 1909, S. 110–142). Itxuraz kontrakoa lirudike, baina ez da hala, bi 'legeek' bi fenomeno desberdin islatu nahi dituzketen neurrian...

Bai, alde batetik daukagú Greenberg-en printzipioa zeinen arabera zenbakietan favoretuko litzakén ordena bat non kantitate handiagoak kokatuko lirakén lehenago zein txikiagoak (the order larger + smaller):

There is evidently a cognitive principle involved in the favoring of the order larger + smaller. If I express a large number, say 10,253 in the order 10,000; 200; 50; 3; the very first element gives me a reasonably close approximation to the final result, and every successive item gives a further approximation. The opposite order leaves the hearer in the dark till the last item is reached. [Greenberg 1978]

eta bestetik dugú Behaghel-en legea on osagai gerota handiagoak (law of increasing members, baita ezaguna nola Panini-ren legea), zeinen arabera egonen litzakén joera bat ki kokatu osagai laburragoak lehenago zein handiagoak an sekuentziak on osagai sintaktikoki-berdinak (normalki lotuak bidéz "eta", "edo" edo juxtaposizioa):

In 1909, in reliance of linguistic material coming from a few dozens of world's languages, Otto Behaghel formulated a law which he called the law of increasing terms. It says that an order of constituents in fixed phrases containing equal elements is subject to a certain regularity, the shorter constituent precedes the longer one in general (their length is determined by the number of syllables). [M. Ruszkowski burúz Behaghel-en legea an "An attempt at statistical verification of Behaghel's linguistic law", 2015]

Bi printzipio horiek irudi ahal dirá kontrajarriak, baina, nola dioen Bittor-ek, ez da hala, zeren referitzen dirén ki aspektu ezberdinak on aipatutako sekuentziak:

• Greenberg-en legea fijatzen da an aspektu semantikoa on osagai partzialak zein diren zerrrendatzen an zenbaki bat, adieraziz ze aurrena kokatzen dirén osagaiak zein daudén semantikoki hurbilago ki kantitate finala (hots, aurrena handiena), bitárten osagai numerikoki gutxio-esanguratsuak kokatuko dirén gero.

• Aldiz, Behaghel fokalizatzen da an osagaien luzera fisikoa, neurtua an silabak, zein den beste kontu bat, kontu ez-semantiko bat, zeini guk deituko geniokén kontu digestiboa (gogoratu "Arazo guztiak joan ohi dirá batera" eta "Lanean beti dabiltza printzipio komunikatibo-prozesatibo berberak, hala nola ere arazo berberak (hartuz forma ezberdinak), zein akaso laburbildu ahal dirén an hitz bakar bat: "atzerakarga"").

Eta gauza da ze printzipio semantikoa gailentzen da gain printzipio digestiboa. [2454] [>>>]